Penerapan Strategi Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi Bangun Ruang oleh Siswa Kelas II SDN 101927 Sekip Lubuk Pakam

Main Article Content

Indah Jelita
Mastari Ramadhani
Emy Hariati

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) learning model on Indonesian language learning outcomes among fourth-grade students. Specifically, it examines: 1) the learning outcomes of students taught using the conventional method, 2) the outcomes of students taught using the CIRC model, and 3) the influence of the CIRC model on Indonesian language learning outcomes. The research employed a quantitative experimental approach with a quasi-experimental design, using pretest and posttest activities. Two groups were studied: an experimental class (15 students) that used the CIRC model, and a control class (15 students) that followed the conventional approach. The findings reveal a significant effect of the CIRC model on student performance, with an average score of 83.33 in the experimental group compared to 76.33 in the control group. The t-test results showed a significant difference (Sig.(2-tailed) = 0.00 < 0.05), confirming that the CIRC model positively influences learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jelita, I., Ramadhani, M., & Hariati, E. (2024). Penerapan Strategi Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi Bangun Ruang oleh Siswa Kelas II SDN 101927 Sekip Lubuk Pakam. Tematik: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.57251/tem.v3i1.1511
Section
Articles

References

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Bakar, R. A. (2012). Pendidikan suatu pengantar. Cipta Pustaka Media Perintis.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Prentice Hall.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85-118.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Sardiman, A. M. (2012). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.963370

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Kencana Prenada Media.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>