Pengaruh Media Interaktif Animasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas V SD Swasta Ira Medan
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on the science learning outcomes of fourth-grade students at IRA Elementary School. The research question focused on whether the application of TPS could improve student performance compared to conventional teaching methods. The experimental research design involved 53 students, divided into two groups: one group applied the TPS model, and the control group used traditional teaching methods. The data collection included both test results (pretest and posttest) and non-test data, such as teacher observations and student participation. The findings revealed that the average score for students in the experimental group was 84.40, significantly higher than the 69.46 average in the control group. The statistical analysis showed that TPS positively impacted student learning outcomes. Based on these results, it is suggested that teachers adopt the Think-Pair-Share model to enhance science learning among elementary students.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anitah, S., et al. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Terbuka.
Arifin, Z. (2014). Penelitian pendidikan metode dan paradigma baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Aunurrahman. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ekosusilo, T., & Kasihadi, A. (2016). Inovasi dalam pendidikan. Jakarta: Ananda Publishing.
Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Karyadi, et al. (2012). Keefektifan metode pembelajaran think pair and share untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada kompetensi dasar mendeskripsikan fungsi konsumsi dan fungsi tabungan. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Diakses dari http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj
Kurniasih, I., et al. (2015). Ragam pengembangan model pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Kata Pena.
Margono. (2009). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Musfiqon, H. M. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakarya.
Nasution, S. (2014). Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Priyatno, D. (2010). Paham analisis statistik data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rifai’i, A., & Anni, C. T. (2012). Psikologi pendidikan. Semarang: Pusat Pengembangan MKU/MKDK-LP3 Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Rohman, M. M. (2015). Studi komparasi keefektifan penerapan model pembelajaran NHT dan MAM terhadap aktivitas dan hasil belajar PKn siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Kedung Pucang Purworejo. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.