Pengaruh Model Kooperatife Tipe Think Pair and Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA oleh Siswa Kelas IV MIS Aisyiyah Wilayah Sumut Tahun Ajaran 2023/2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to address the low learning outcomes in science education for fourth-grade students at MIS Aisyiyah Elementary School, North Sumatra, where teaching tends to be teacher-centered. To remedy this issue, the Think Pair and Share cooperative learning model was implemented. An experimental research method was employed, involving 53 students divided into two groups. The experimental group used the Think Pair and Share model, while the control group applied conventional teaching methods. Data were collected through both test-based measures (pretest and posttest) and non-test observations, including teacher performance and student activity during the learning process. The results revealed a significant improvement in the experimental group, with an average score of 84.40, compared to 69.46 in the control group. It can be concluded that the implementation of the Think Pair and Share cooperative learning model positively impacts science learning outcomes for fourth-grade students. It is recommended that teachers adopt this model to enhance the effectiveness of science education in similar contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anitah, S. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Terbuka.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Arifin, Z. (2014). Penelitian pendidikan: Metode dan paradigma baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aunurrahman. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Hamalik, O. (2002). Proses belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Karyadi. (2012). Keefektifan metode pembelajaran Think Pair and Share untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada kompetensi dasar mendeskripsikan fungsi konsumsi dan fungsi tabungan. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2015). Ragam pengembangan model pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Kata Pena.
Margono. (2009). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Musfiqon, H. M. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakarya.
Nasution, S. (2014). Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Priyatno, D. (2010). Paham analisis statistik data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rifai’i, A., & Anni, C. T. (2012). Psikologi pendidikan. Semarang: Pusat Pengembangan MKU/MKDK-LP3 Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Rohman, M. M. (2015). Studi komparasi keefektifan penerapan model pembelajaran NHT dan MAM terhadap aktivitas dan hasil belajar PKn siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Kedungpucang Purworejo. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.