Pengembangan Media Interaktif Renderforest untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Teks Negosiasi Siswa Kelas X SMK Musda Perbaungan

Main Article Content

Elvira Susanti
Nila Safina
Rika Kartika

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of Render Forest interactive media on negotiation text material for class X at Vocational School Musda Perbaungan. The study involved 32 students as samples and utilized assessments from material and design expert validators. The results showed that the development was categorized as "Feasible." Material expert I rated it 84% ("Decent"), and material expert II rated it 81.33% ("Decent"). Media expert I rated it 94% ("Very Appropriate"), and media expert II rated it 80% ("Decent"). The Indonesian language teacher's assessment was 89.09% ("Very Decent"). The findings suggest that using Render Forest-assisted teaching materials significantly enhances the learning process. Overall, the study concludes that the interactive media is highly effective and suitable for classroom use, providing a valuable resource for improving student engagement and understanding of negotiation texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Susanti, E., Safina, N., & Kartika, R. (2024). Pengembangan Media Interaktif Renderforest untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Teks Negosiasi Siswa Kelas X SMK Musda Perbaungan. Sintaks: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.57251/sin.v4i2.1370
Section
Articles

References

Ahdar. (2021). Pendidikan dan tugas sosial. Jakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.

Dewey, J. (1997). Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5

Hidayat, R. (2019). Filosofi Pendidikan: Memahami Esensi dan Implementasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782399

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho, A. (2017). Inovasi dalam pembelajaran: Penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rosen, Y., & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the Time to Know program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782588

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Bloomington, IN: Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped, Indiana University.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2002). Pendidikan, kebudayaan, dan masyarakat madani Indonesia. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>