Pemanfaatan Penilaian Otentik Berbasis Kemandirian Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah

Main Article Content

Risdam Habibi Hasibuan

Abstract

Independent learning is a type of learning in which students must complete authentic assessments based on their own initiative. As a result, various approaches to developing quality history learning steps and a Pancasila profile in relation to independent schools with student autonomy are required. The development of history learning can be accomplished through three methods of implementing the social profile: teaching resources, learning methods, and authentic assessment. The use of authentic assessment will encompass the selection of instructional materials and learning models, making it a significant channel. Authentic assessment guides learning by allowing students to create various learning activities that contain the Pancasila Profile's contents during the learning process. Authentic assessment provides a true picture of students' reading abilities as well as a measure of their progress toward independence. As a result of this fact, authentic assessment can aid in the improvement of history learning as well as the development of student independence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasibuan, R. H. (2023). Pemanfaatan Penilaian Otentik Berbasis Kemandirian Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Islamic Education, 3(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.57251/ie.v3i2.1119
Section
Articles

References

Aitken, M., Martinussen, R., Wolfe, R. G., & Tannock, R. (2015). Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Canadian Elementary School Sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(3), 155–165.

Cox, C. (1999). Teaching Language Arts: A Student–and Response–Centered Class- room. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Daliman. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for A Changing World: What TeachersShould Learn and Be Able To Do. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publishing – Willey & Sons.

Et.al, N. (2002). Building Learning Com - munities with Character. Alexandria: ASCD.

Hadley, O. (2001). Teaching Language in Con- text. New York: Heilin-Heilin.

Kemendiknas. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Profil Pancasila Bangsa. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Lang, H. R., & Evans, D. N. (n.d.). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston: Pearson.

Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matter. New York: A Touchstone Book.

Moeloeng, D. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Nicholss, G. (2002). Learning to Teach. Great Britain: Kogan Page Limited.

Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.

Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills. Ox- ford: Heinemann.

Sandi, G. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 45(3), 241–251.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Ulhaq, Z. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Kotamadya Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.062.06

Aitken, M., Martinussen, R., Wolfe, R. G., & Tannock, R. (2015). Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Canadian Elementary School Sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(3), 155–165.

Cox, C. (1999). Teaching Language Arts: A Student–and Response–Centered Class- room. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Daliman. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for A Changing World: What TeachersShould Learn and Be Able To Do. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publishing – Willey & Sons.

Et.al, N. (2002). Building Learning Com - munities with Character. Alexandria: ASCD.

Hadley, O. (2001). Teaching Language in Con- text. New York: Heilin-Heilin.

Kemendiknas. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Profil Pancasila Bangsa. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Lang, H. R., & Evans, D. N. (n.d.). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston: Pearson.

Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matter. New York: A Touchstone Book.

Moeloeng, D. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Nicholss, G. (2002). Learning to Teach. Great Britain: Kogan Page Limited.

Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.

Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills. Ox- ford: Heinemann.

Sandi, G. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 45(3), 241–251.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Ulhaq, Z. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Kotamadya Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.062.06

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.