Pemanfaatan Penilaian Otentik Berbasis Kemandirian Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah
Main Article Content
Abstract
Independent learning is a type of learning in which students must complete authentic assessments based on their own initiative. As a result, various approaches to developing quality history learning steps and a Pancasila profile in relation to independent schools with student autonomy are required. The development of history learning can be accomplished through three methods of implementing the social profile: teaching resources, learning methods, and authentic assessment. The use of authentic assessment will encompass the selection of instructional materials and learning models, making it a significant channel. Authentic assessment guides learning by allowing students to create various learning activities that contain the Pancasila Profile's contents during the learning process. Authentic assessment provides a true picture of students' reading abilities as well as a measure of their progress toward independence. As a result of this fact, authentic assessment can aid in the improvement of history learning as well as the development of student independence.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aitken, M., Martinussen, R., Wolfe, R. G., & Tannock, R. (2015). Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Canadian Elementary School Sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(3), 155–165.
Cox, C. (1999). Teaching Language Arts: A Student–and Response–Centered Class- room. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Daliman. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for A Changing World: What TeachersShould Learn and Be Able To Do. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publishing – Willey & Sons.
Et.al, N. (2002). Building Learning Com - munities with Character. Alexandria: ASCD.
Hadley, O. (2001). Teaching Language in Con- text. New York: Heilin-Heilin.
Kemendiknas. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Profil Pancasila Bangsa. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
Lang, H. R., & Evans, D. N. (n.d.). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston: Pearson.
Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matter. New York: A Touchstone Book.
Moeloeng, D. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nicholss, G. (2002). Learning to Teach. Great Britain: Kogan Page Limited.
Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills. Ox- ford: Heinemann.
Sandi, G. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 45(3), 241–251.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Ulhaq, Z. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Kotamadya Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.062.06
Aitken, M., Martinussen, R., Wolfe, R. G., & Tannock, R. (2015). Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Canadian Elementary School Sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(3), 155–165.
Cox, C. (1999). Teaching Language Arts: A Student–and Response–Centered Class- room. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Daliman. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for A Changing World: What TeachersShould Learn and Be Able To Do. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass Publishing – Willey & Sons.
Et.al, N. (2002). Building Learning Com - munities with Character. Alexandria: ASCD.
Hadley, O. (2001). Teaching Language in Con- text. New York: Heilin-Heilin.
Kemendiknas. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Profil Pancasila Bangsa. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
Lang, H. R., & Evans, D. N. (n.d.). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston: Pearson.
Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matter. New York: A Touchstone Book.
Moeloeng, D. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nicholss, G. (2002). Learning to Teach. Great Britain: Kogan Page Limited.
Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills. Ox- ford: Heinemann.
Sandi, G. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 45(3), 241–251.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Ulhaq, Z. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Kotamadya Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.062.06