Urgency of Evaluation of Sekolah Penggerak Program Through the Cipp Model (Context, Input, Process, Product): A Critical Study

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 12, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57251/el.v4i1.1288
Keywords:
Sekolah Penggerak, Merdeka Curriculum, CIPP Model, School Transformation

Main Article Content

Anju Nofarof Hasudungan
SMA Negeri 1 Rupat Riau
Amerruddin Shah Suboh
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Surya Aymanda Nababan
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Abstract

This research aims to recommend the urgency of evaluating the Sekolah Penggerak program in high schools using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process and Product) model. Sekolah Penggerak are schools selected and selected by the Ministry of Education and Culture, Technology Research of the Republic of Indonesia to implement the Merdeka curriculum. The Sekolah Penggerak can also be assumed to be a derivative product of the Merdeka curriculum which replaced the 2013 curriculum and the emergency curriculum. This research uses qualitative research. Qualitative research is research that aims to understand the conditions of a context by leading to a detailed and in-depth picture of what is happening according to what is happening. The results of the research show that the Ministry of Education and Culture, under the leadership of Nadiem Anwar Makarim, launched a superior program, namely, Sekolah Penggerak which is believed to be a necessity and a way to improve and improve the quality of education in schools. The Sekolah Penggerak program that has been implemented should have undergone a comprehensive evaluation and this is an important need. Critically, programs that have been created and implemented in a lively manner and using funds from public money which also have direct contact with the people should be evaluated to determine their usefulness in the field of education. Therefore, the author recommends the CIPP model as an evaluation model used for the Sekolah Penggerak program which is the current flagship program of the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasudungan, A. N., Suboh, A. S., & Nababan, S. A. (2024). Urgency of Evaluation of Sekolah Penggerak Program Through the Cipp Model (Context, Input, Process, Product): A Critical Study. Education & Learning, 4(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.57251/el.v4i1.1288
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ahid, N., & Sufirmansyah, S. (2022). The Implementation of Merdeka Belajar Policy in East Java. Didaktika Religia, 10(1 SE-Articles), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.30762/didaktika.v10i1.8

Anh, V. T. K. (2018). EVALUATION MODELS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4252

Astawa, I. M. M. (2021). PROGRAM SEKOLAH PENGGERAK SEBAGAI KATALISATOR DALAM PENJAMINAN DAN PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN.

Aulya, A. F., Suparman, N., & Kaunain, S. N. (2022). Evaluation Analysis of Educational Programs. Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education (JQAIE), 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v2i1.605

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Desianti, L. C., & Rahayuningsih, T. (2022). Sekolah Penggerak and Guru Penggerak Evaluation Policy as Pioneers of Changes in The Education System in The New Paradigm Curriculum. Pedagonal?: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v6i1.4936

Direktorat Sekolah Dasar Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Kemendikbud Luncurkan Program Sekolah Penggerak. Ditpsd.Kemdikbud.Go.Id.

Fikri, A., & Hasudungan, A. N. (2021). Analisis Kompetensi Dasar Esensial pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Education (IJSSE), 3(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijsse.v3i1.4008

Gullickson, A. M., King, J. A., LaVelle, J. M., & Clinton, J. M. (2019). The current state of evaluator education: A situation analysis and call to action. Evaluation and Program Planning, 75, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.012

Hadi, A., Marniati, M., Ngindana, R., Kurdi, M. S., Kurdi, M. S., & Fauziah, F. (2023). New Paradigm of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3126

Hasanah, E., Suyatno, S., Maryani, I., Badar, M. I. Al, Fitria, Y., & Patmasari, L. (2022). Conceptual Model of Differentiated-Instruction (DI) Based on Teachers’ Experiences in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 12(10), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650

Hasudungan, A. N., & Abidin, N. F. (2020). Independent Learning: Forming The Pancasila Learner Through Historical Learning In Senior High School. In Suhartono (Ed.), Social, Humanities, and Education Studies (SHEs): Conference Series (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 34–42). Sebelas Maret Univeristy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i2.46219

Hasudungan, A. N., & Kurniawan, Y. (2018). Meningkatkan Kesadaran Generasi Emas Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Melalui Inovasi Digital Platform www.indonesia2045.org (A. Sifaunajah (ed.); Vol. 1, pp. 51–58). SNAMI?: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin KH. A. Wahab Hasullah University Jombang.

Hasudungan, A. N., Ofianto, & Ningsih, T. Z. (2022). Learning Loss: A Real Threat in Education for Underprivileged Students and Remote Regions during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2223

Irawan, S., & Prasetyo, D. (2020). The evaluation of online school examination implementation using CIPP model. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.33032

Jannati, P., Ramadhan, F. A., & Rohimawan, M. A. (2023). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Dasar. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i1.1714

Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Program Sekolah Penggerak. Sekolah.Penggerak.Kemdikbud.Go.Id.

Khiftiyah, L., Wuryandini, E., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA DALAM MENCIPTAKAN PEMBELAJARAN YANG BERPIHAK PADA PESERTA DIDIK DI SEKOLAH PENGGERAK TK JANNETA GEBANGANOM KABUPATEN KENDAL. Didaktik?: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(04), 984–998. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i04.1570

Kurniasih, A. D. (2022). Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Kepemimpinan Astha Brata Untuk Mewujudukan Profil Pelajar Pancasila Melalui Sekolah Penggerak. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 5(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v5i1.57773

Marmoah, S., Istiyati, S., Mahfud, H., Supianto, S., & Sukarno, S. (2022). Persepsi Guru terhadap Implementasi Program Sekolah Penggerak di Sekolah Dasar. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 6(2), 361. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v6i2.65122

Maulana, M. A., Yuliana, L., Syalihin, B., & Salam, K. U. (2024). Analysis of School Principals' Cohesion on the Sekolah Penggerak Program As a Catalyst to Realize the Vision of Indonesian Education in the City of Yogyakarta. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 33, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1413295

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd Edition (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Muqorobin, Komarudin, Badrujaman, A., Arthur, R., & Prayogi, S. (2022). CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1), 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012039

Ningrum, S. S. (2022). Tingkat Kesiapan Individu Dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Di Sekolah Penggerak Berdasarkan Motivasi Intrinsik Dan Ekstrinsik. Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Terapan (PENATARAN), 7(2), 136–145.

Rachmawati, N., Marini, A., Nafiah, M., & Nurasiah, I. (2022). Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Impelementasi Kurikulum Prototipe di Sekolah Penggerak Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3613–3625. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2714

Rahayuningsih, F. (2022). INTERNALISASI FILOSOFI PENDIDIKAN KI HAJAR DEWANTARA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PROFIL PELAJAR PANCASILA. SOCIAL?: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 1(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v1i3.925

Ritonga, A. A., Lubis, Y. W., Masitha, S., & Harahap, C. P. (2022). Program Sekolah Penggerak Sebagai Inovasi Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan di SD Negeri 104267 Pegajahan. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, 31(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v31i2.2637

Rocha, A. C., Silva, M., & Duarte, C. (2022). How is sexuality education for adolescents evaluated? A systematic review based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. Sex Education, 22(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1908984

Rohmah, A. N., Sari, I. J., Rohmah, N. L., Syafira, R., Fitriana, F., & Admoko, S. (2023). Implementation of the “Merdeka Belajar” Curriculum in the Industrial 4.0 Era. International Journal of Research and Community Empowerment, 1(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.58706/ijorce.v1n1.p22-28

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In Evaluation Models (pp. 279–317). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Tuna, H., & Ba?dal, M. (2021). Curriculum evaluation of tourism undergraduate programs in Turkey: A CIPP model-based framework. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100324

Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086

Utami, Y. P., & Suswanto, B. (2022). The Educational Curriculum Reform in Indonesia: Supporting “Independent Learning Independent Campus (MBKM).” SHS Web of Conferences, 149, 01041. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214901041

Yuliani, G., Kamal, M., Iswantir, I., & Sesmiarni, Z. (2022). Penggunaan Platform Pembelajaran Online oleh Guru PAI. Tarbiyah Wa Ta’lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.21093/twt.v9i1.4304