Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Akta Perjanjian Jual Beli Lunas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris (Studi Putusan Nomor 179/Pdt/2018/PT. BTN)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to describe the legal responsibility of a notary in a land and building sale and purchase agreement, to describe the legal protection of buyers who have good intentions in a land and building sale and purchase agreement, how to analyze the basic legal considerations of the panel of judges in Decision Number 179/PDT/2018/ PT BTN related to the sale and purchase agreement in full for land and buildings. The research was carried out using legal research, namely normative juridical which is descriptive-analytical, which is research that aims to describe a condition or symptom or to determine whether there is a relationship between a symptom and other symptoms. The data collection technique used was a literature study. The results of the research and discussion show that the notary's legal responsibility for the sale and purchase agreement deed he made is that if the notary in making an authentic deed is not thorough and careful, then the notary can be held accountable in the form of claims to compensate for losses in the form of reimbursement of costs and compensation, because of the notary's carelessness and inaccuracy in making the deed. Legal protection for a buyer with good intentions in a sale and purchase agreement in full for land and buildings depends on the contents of the binding sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) itself. The basic analysis of the legal considerations of the panel of judges in Decision Number 179/PDT/2018/PT BTN regarding the sale and purchase agreement in full for land and buildings is that the notary has conducted research and checked and in the signing process, both the seller and the buyer have no objections, until the deed minutation process - deed made by the defendant.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Al-Rashid, H. (1985). Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Sewa-Menyewa Perumahan Menurut Ketentuan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rahman, F. A. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Mengenal Para Penghadap. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art11
Budiono, H. (2004, March 10). Pengikatan Jual Beli dan Kuasa Mutlak. Majalah Renvoi.
Dersanala, N. F., and Wisnuwardhani, D. A. (2022). Perj?nji?n Pengik?t?n Ju?l Beli sebagai Sy?r?t Penerbit?n Denah Lokasi Perum?h?n. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v7i2p303-310
Efendi, J., and Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Depok: Prenada Media Group.
Iryadi, I. (2019). Kedudukan Akta Otentik dalam Hubungannya dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546
Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis serta Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kemara, I. M. E., Kusuma, A. A. G. A. D., and Westra, I. K. (2013). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Hak Milik Atas Tanah yang Dibuatnya Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1(9). Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/6693
Muhtadi, M. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hans Kelsen dalam Tertib Hukum Indonesia. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no3.75
Nasution, B. J. (2011). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Palit, R. C. (2015). Kekuatan Akta di Bawah Tangan Sebagai Alat Bukti di Pengadilan. Lex Privatum, 3(2). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7842
Pramono, D. (2015). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 12(3). Retrieved from https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/1225
Putri, K. M., Anwary, I., and Haiti, D. (2022). Kewajiban Notaris melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak secara Bersama-Sama. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.21
Sagala, E. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Menjalankan Tugas Profesinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 4(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.36987/JIAD.V4I1.349
Sibuea, M. A. R. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Notaris Atas Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Cacat Dalam Komparisi. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p137-159
Silalahi, U. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sjaifurrachman. (2010). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sukanto, S., and Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Supriyadi, S. (2017). Kedudukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pertanahan. Arena Hukum, 10(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01002.3
Tanoto, D., and Nurdin, A. R. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik Atas Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah. Kertha Semaya?: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i07.p16
Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.