Pengaruh Pembelajaran Prototipe Terhadap Kemandirian Siswa Kelas V UPT SPF SDN 106157 Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research investigates the effect of Prototype Learning (X) on student independence (Y) in class V at UPT SPF SDN 106157 during the 2022/2023 academic year. The study uses an experimental method to analyze the relationship between the Prototype Learning model and students' independence. The results demonstrate that Prototype Learning falls into the "good" category, with students' independence similarly categorized as "good," achieving an average score of 82.2 in the experimental class. Students who utilized Prototype Learning recorded an average independence test score of 82.2 with a standard deviation of 9.06, while those in the control group who did not use the model achieved an average score of 51.67 with a standard deviation of 7.18. The hypothesis testing showed a t-value (th) of 0.06, which was compared with the critical t-table value of 0.245 at a 5% significance level for N = 60. Since 0.245 > 0.06, the hypothesis that Prototype Learning positively impacts student independence is accepted. This finding suggests that Prototype Learning is an effective method for enhancing student independence, providing a structured and supportive learning environment that fosters personal growth and academic success.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented reality in education – cases, places, and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Clark, R. E., & Feldon, D. F. (2014). Ten common but questionable principles of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 151–173). Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Pergamon.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mindtools for conceptual change. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.