Peningkatan Kemampuan Penulisan Surat Dinas para Pegawai Administrasi
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on the challenges of writing official letters in accordance with correct and proper language guidelines. The background of this research includes difficulties in composing official letters that adhere to the guidelines, understanding language rules (PUEBI, TBBI), and using appropriate language in writing official letters. The study offers three solutions: (a) conducting academic studies, simplifying the guidelines, and contextualizing them; (b) providing assistance in the form of small groups to apply language rules in composing official letters so that PUEBI can be implemented; (c) providing guidance and training in writing official letters using proper, logical, informative, and unambiguous language. The research methodology employs a problem-solving approach combined with focus group discussions (FGD), beginning with an analysis of conditions and problems, formulating directed problems, implementing problem-solving training for letter writing, and conducting evaluations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning. London: Kogan Page.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1996). Analisis wacana (Terjemahan I. Soetikno). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Depdikbud. (1988). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Cet. Ke-1). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (2010). Research methods for managers (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Haryatmoko. (2017). Critical discourse analysis (Analisis wacana kritis): Landasan teori, metodologi, dan penerapan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Johan, G. M. (2018). Analisis kesalahan berbahasa Indonesia dalam proses diskusi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18(1), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs
Keraf, G. (2010). Diksi dan gaya bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leksono, M. L. (2019). Analisis kesalahan penggunaan ejaan bahasa Indonesia (PUEBI) pada tugas makalah dan laporan praktikum mahasiswa IT Telkom Purwokerto. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 116-120.
Mulyana, D. (2005). Kajian wacana: Teori, metode aplikasi, dan prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Qhadafi, M. R. (2018). Analisis kesalahan penulisan ejaan yang disempurnakan dalam teks negosiasi siswa SMA Negeri 3 Palu. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 3(4), 1–21.
Setyawati, L. (2020). Pedoman penulisan surat dinas: Tinjauan dari aspek kebahasaan. Jakarta: Penerbit Ilmu Bahasa.
Tamara, B., Naufal, D., Ismail, R. B., et al. (2020). Analisis kesalahan penggunaan ejaan dan tanda baca pada media sosial resmi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Jurnal Parafrasa: Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 22-29.
Trianton, T., & Yulisetiani, S. (2016). Buku pintar ejaan bahasa Indonesia. Bekasi: Checklist.
Widodo, A. (2019). Kesalahan umum dalam penulisan surat dinas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pendidikan.