Transparansi Keuangan Berbasis Good Governance di Pondok Pesantren Al Multazam Husnul Khotimah Kuningan Jawa Barat
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research addresses the lack of studies on the financial management governance of Islamic boarding schools (pondok pesantren), particularly concerning transparency. While the majority of pesantren tend to follow traditional approaches, Al Multazam Husnul Khotimah Islamic Boarding School in Kuningan, West Java, serves as an exemplary model with its effective, technologically-based, and transparent financial management. The strengths of this pesantren include the use of appropriate technology, an independent external audit team, and financial resources from educational contributions. The research focuses on general financial management with an emphasis on transparency based on good governance. The qualitative research method employs a case study approach and analysis using the Miles & Huberman model. Findings indicate improved transparency through an integrative application system, supporting financial management based on good governance principles, involving the integration of values and professional financial expertise, including stages of institutional building, application-based integrative centralization, and monitoring effectiveness as well as financial efficiency audits.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar: CV. Syalir Media Press.
Beachboard, J. C., Aytes, K., & Probst, J. (2010). IT Governance and IT Management: Is There a Difference That Makes a Difference? 077–086. https://doi.org/10.28945/1234
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Edition). London: Sage Publications.
Evans, J., & Gold, A. (2005). Reflecting On School Management. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982211
Haningsih, S. (2008). Peran Strategis Pesantren, Madrasah dan Sekolah Islam di Indonesia. El-Tarbawi, 1(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.20885/tarbawi.vol1.iss1.art3
Kariyanto, H. (2020). Peran Pondok Pesantren dalam Masyarakat Modern. Jurnal Pendidikan “Edukasia Multikultura,” 2(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.29300/JEM.V2I2.4646
Murdayanti, Y., & Puruwita, D. (2019). Kompetensi SDM Keuangan dan Akuntabilitas Pesantren. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 7(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaemb.v7i1.1085
Pakar, S. I. (2016). Pendidikan dan Pesantren. Jakarta: Elsi Pro.
Rahardjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Malang: Gema.
Raharjo, D. (1974). Pesantren dan Pembaharuan. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership (The Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series) (2nd Edition). California: Jossey-Bass.
Syafe’i, I. (2017). Pondok Pesantren: Lembaga Pendidikan Pembentukan Karakter. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v8i1.2097
Tirole, J. (2006). The Theory of Corporate Finance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 tentang Pesantren. , Pub. L. No. 18, peraturan.bpk.go.id (2019). Indonesia: LN.2019/NO.191, TLN NO.6406, JDIH.SETNEG.GO.ID?: 27 HLM.
Undang-undang (UU) tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. , Pub. L. No. 20 (2003). Indonesia: LN.2003/NO.78, TLN NO.4301, LL SETNEG?: 37 HLM.
Wahjoetomo. (1997). Perguruan Tinggi Pesantren: Pendidikan Tinggi Alternatif Masa Depan. Jakarta: Gema Insan Press.
Winardi. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yusuf, A. Muri. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.